MBA

MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track)

MBA Energy & Project Management — one admission, a shared core, two named specialisations.

Online & New Capital Campus

4 Semesters (2 Years)42 creditsEnglish and Arabic (bilingual assessment; academic Arabic required for AR-medium tracks)

Begin your application Explore programme

MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track)

Overview

A double-path MBA for the energy and infrastructure sector. Shared management core, then pathways in Energy Business (markets, diversification, transition) and Project Management (planning, contracts, delivery), ending with a capstone on delivering an energy or infrastructure project. Imperial University in Cairo delivers this award fully online across the Arab region. There is no campus. English is the administrative language of the award; Arabic-medium tracks require additional language evidence. Assessment is identity-checked. This is an academic MBA award; where a field has a licensing or registration route, that remains a matter for your professional body or regulator. You will work through the material as a practitioner-researcher: applied methods, real or anonymised cases, and a supervised capstone or dissertation as the final component. Faculty mark whether you noticed the constraints a slide deck usually hides. MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track) is taught as one award, not a list of unrelated modules. The published length is 4 Semesters (2 Years), and the credit total is 42. Students move from Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis through Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis; Financial & Management Accounting; Leadership & Organisational Behaviour; Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment; Global Energy Markets & Pricing; Economic Diversification & Local Content, and finish on Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan. Each course has a question, a method, and a submission. In this field, students draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses. Reading is a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. The artefact a marker expects is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. The award is built so that a graduate can do the following in practice: Build a greenhouse-gas inventory and a credible transition plan Apply ESG disclosure standards and prepare for assurance Analyse transition and physical risk for a firm or a portfolio Teaching assumes the student can read a source, attempt a problem before the seminar, and revise after feedback. Attendance at live seminars is part of the design. The capstone or final course must use the methods of the earlier courses; a project that ignores them does not pass. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. The pages for each course name the topics that are examined. Those topics are the syllabus. A brochure line is not a substitute for them.

The programme carries 42 credits across four assessed modules. Delivery is tuition-free aside from the examination fee. Transcripts use letter grades and a GPA scale consistent with Imperial University in Cairo awards. No professional-body logo is used in marketing to imply endorsement.

Who This Programme Is For

Managers taking on a sustainability brief
Finance and risk staff working on ESG
Operations and procurement leads on Scope 3
Graduates entering the field

How you can study

Digital only

Study online

100% tuition-free online

Online tuition is completely free. Study from anywhere in Egypt, the Arab region, and worldwide with full digital flexibility.

✦ Tuition: £0 / $0
✦ Examinations are free. There is no exam fee.
✦ Learn from anywhere · Live online seminars

Apply online →

What You Will Learn

Build a greenhouse-gas inventory and a credible transition plan
Apply ESG disclosure standards and prepare for assurance
Analyse transition and physical risk for a firm or a portfolio
Lead the organisational change behind a sustainability target

Curriculum

Term 1 — Shared Management Core

Code	Course	Credits · hours
ALEP701	Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis (ALEP701) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP701-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis ALEP701-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis ALEP701-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis ALEP701-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis ALEP701-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis ALEP701-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Managerial Economics & Decision Analysis	3 · 30 h
ALEP702	Financial & Management Accounting Financial & Management Accounting (ALEP702) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can read a set of figures, build a small case, and state which assumption moves the result, using Financial & Management Accounting as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses financial statements, a recognition note, and a risk report. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation that separates the decision, the numbers, and the risk. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer an accounting, audit, or financial-services licence. ALEP702-M1 · Statements: income, position, and cash — Financial & Management Accounting ALEP702-M2 · Recognition, ratios, and what the numbers cannot show — Financial & Management Accounting ALEP702-M3 · Cash flows, discount rates, and sensitivity — Financial & Management Accounting ALEP702-M4 · Market, credit, and operating risk — Financial & Management Accounting ALEP702-M5 · Controls, exceptions, and reporting — Financial & Management Accounting ALEP702-M6 · An investment or operating recommendation — Financial & Management Accounting	3 · 30 h
ALEP703	Leadership & Organisational Behaviour Leadership & Organisational Behaviour (ALEP703) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Leadership & Organisational Behaviour as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP703-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Leadership & Organisational Behaviour ALEP703-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Leadership & Organisational Behaviour ALEP703-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Leadership & Organisational Behaviour ALEP703-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Leadership & Organisational Behaviour ALEP703-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Leadership & Organisational Behaviour ALEP703-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Leadership & Organisational Behaviour	3 · 30 h
ALEP704	Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment (ALEP704) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP704-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment ALEP704-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment ALEP704-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment ALEP704-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment ALEP704-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment ALEP704-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Research Methods & Identity-Checked Assessment	3 · 30 h

Term 2 — Pathway A: Energy Business

Code	Course	Credits · hours
ALEP705	Global Energy Markets & Pricing Global Energy Markets & Pricing (ALEP705) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Global Energy Markets & Pricing as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP705-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Global Energy Markets & Pricing ALEP705-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Global Energy Markets & Pricing ALEP705-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Global Energy Markets & Pricing ALEP705-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Global Energy Markets & Pricing ALEP705-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Global Energy Markets & Pricing ALEP705-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Global Energy Markets & Pricing	3 · 30 h
ALEP706	Economic Diversification & Local Content Economic Diversification & Local Content (ALEP706) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Economic Diversification & Local Content as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP706-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Economic Diversification & Local Content ALEP706-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Economic Diversification & Local Content ALEP706-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Economic Diversification & Local Content ALEP706-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Economic Diversification & Local Content ALEP706-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Economic Diversification & Local Content ALEP706-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Economic Diversification & Local Content	3 · 30 h
ALEP707	Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen (ALEP707) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP707-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen ALEP707-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen ALEP707-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen ALEP707-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen ALEP707-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen ALEP707-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Energy Transition, Renewables & Hydrogen	3 · 30 h
ALEP708	Energy Regulation & Public Investment Energy Regulation & Public Investment (ALEP708) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Energy Regulation & Public Investment as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP708-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Energy Regulation & Public Investment ALEP708-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Energy Regulation & Public Investment ALEP708-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Energy Regulation & Public Investment ALEP708-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Energy Regulation & Public Investment ALEP708-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Energy Regulation & Public Investment ALEP708-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Energy Regulation & Public Investment	3 · 30 h

Term 3 — Pathway B: Project Management

Code	Course	Credits · hours
ALEP709	Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control (ALEP709) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP709-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control ALEP709-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control ALEP709-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control ALEP709-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control ALEP709-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control ALEP709-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control	3 · 30 h
ALEP710	Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) (ALEP710) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP710-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) ALEP710-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) ALEP710-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) ALEP710-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) ALEP710-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) ALEP710-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy)	3 · 30 h
ALEP711	Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery (ALEP711) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP711-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery ALEP711-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery ALEP711-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery ALEP711-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery ALEP711-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery ALEP711-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery	3 · 30 h

Code

Course

Credits · hours

ALEP709

Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control

Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control (ALEP709) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence.

ALEP709-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control
ALEP709-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control
ALEP709-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control
ALEP709-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control
ALEP709-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control
ALEP709-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Project Planning, Scheduling & Cost Control

3 · 30 h

ALEP710

Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy)

Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) (ALEP710) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy) as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence.

ALEP710-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy)
ALEP710-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy)
ALEP710-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy)
ALEP710-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy)
ALEP710-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy)
ALEP710-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Contracts, Procurement & Claims (FIDIC literacy)

3 · 30 h

ALEP711

Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery

Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery (ALEP711) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence.

ALEP711-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery
ALEP711-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery
ALEP711-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery
ALEP711-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery
ALEP711-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery
ALEP711-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Risk, Stakeholders & Megaproject Delivery

3 · 30 h

Term 4 — Integration & Dual-Track Capstone

Code	Course	Credits · hours
ALEP712	Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice (ALEP712) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP712-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice ALEP712-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice ALEP712-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice ALEP712-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice ALEP712-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice ALEP712-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice	3 · 30 h
ALEP713	Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan (ALEP713) is a 6-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 60 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence. ALEP713-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan ALEP713-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan ALEP713-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan ALEP713-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan ALEP713-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan ALEP713-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan	6 · 60 h

Code

Course

Credits · hours

ALEP712

Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice

Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice (ALEP712) is a 3-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 30 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence.

ALEP712-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice
ALEP712-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice
ALEP712-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice
ALEP712-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice
ALEP712-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice
ALEP712-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Integrating Two Disciplines in Practice

3 · 30 h

ALEP713

Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan

Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan (ALEP713) is a 6-credit course on MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track), with 60 notional learning hours. By the end, students can draw the system, name the constraint that binds it, and compare two responses, using Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a system description, an indicator note, and a project option paper. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a recommendation for one decision, with the evidence and the downside. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. This course does not confer a professional engineering licence.

ALEP713-M1 · System boundary, constraint, and actors — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan
ALEP713-M2 · Indicators, sources of error, and a better measure — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan
ALEP713-M3 · Two options on cost, time, and downside — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan
ALEP713-M4 · Safety, environmental limit, and who bears the risk — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan
ALEP713-M5 · A site, grid, or product decision — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan
ALEP713-M6 · A recommendation with evidence and residual risk — Dual-Track Capstone: Energy or Infrastructure Project Plan

6 · 60 h

Career Paths

Sustainability or ESG manager
Climate risk and sustainable-finance roles
Environmental compliance and reporting
Transition and net-zero programme management
Advisory and assurance positions

Programme Highlights

A management degree with the science you need to use it
GHG accounting, ESG reporting and sustainable finance
A capstone on a real organisational sustainability problem
Stackable certificate route where offered

Assessment

Modules are assessed through a published mix of coursework, applied projects, and examinations. Exam windows are announced in advance so students in other time zones are not forced into overnight sittings. Alternative arrangements are available where documented.

Admission requirements

Academic entry

Bachelor's degree from a recognised institution (minimum 2:2 / GPA 2.5/4.0 or an equivalent national scale)
Identity document for remote identity-checked assessment enrolment

English language

English proficiency: IELTS 5.5, TOEFL 46 or equivalent (waived for prior English-medium study). Arabic-medium tracks require additional academic-Arabic evidence as stated on the programme page.

Documents

Statement of Purpose (500 words minimum) covering goals, professional context and fit
Two academic or professional references with verifiable contact details
CV or résumé covering education and relevant work
Official transcripts (digital copies accepted at application; certified copies before award)

Programme questions

How long is the MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track)?

The published duration is 4 Semesters (2 Years). Teaching language: English and Arabic (bilingual assessment; academic Arabic required for AR-medium tracks). Actual time-to-complete depends on mode and any recognised prior learning.

Can I study this from my country?

You may study this award fully online from your country, or — where published — on campus at IUC. Online study does not require a student visa. Campus study may.

What does it cost?

Degree tuition for this award is published as £0 / tuition-free on the online pathway. Examination or administrative fees may apply at checkout — never an annual tuition invoice. Check the Fees page for any extras.

What are the entry requirements?

Requirements are grouped on this page (academic, English, documents). Equivalent qualifications are considered. English may be waived after prior English-medium study.

How is the programme assessed?

Assessment is typically a mix of coursework, projects, and examinations. Doctoral awards include a thesis or dissertation and an oral examination. Details sit in the programme specification and module outlines.

Will this award be recognised where I live?

Recognition of the award for local employment, professional licence, or ministry attestation is decided by your employer or regulator. Imperial University in Cairo publishes verification pages for certificates. We do not claim automatic equivalence in every country.

How do I apply?

Start an application on this website. Progress is saved from the first step. Admissions: admissions@iucairo.co.uk.

Recognised & Accredited

Ready to begin?MBA Energy & Project Management (Dual Track)

Apply now